<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who visits FOD-detection.com?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://fod-detection.com/2011/02/02/who-visits-fod-detection-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://fod-detection.com/2011/02/02/who-visits-fod-detection-com/</link>
	<description>FOD detection news and independent advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>https://fod-detection.com/2011/02/02/who-visits-fod-detection-com/comment-page-1/#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fod-detection.com/?p=1383#comment-2487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I pointed out in the article, the system manufacturers are based in the US, UK, Israel and Singapore.
To say that they are &quot;developing&quot; systems I think is misleading, the fact is they have &quot;developed&quot; systems, they exist as products, and are installed at airports already. As for the cost of maintaining a FOD detection system, it is up to individual airports to do their own cost-benefit analysis, and the big unknown will be the cost due to FOD. For this information I would recommend the report published by Ian McCreary, as discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://fod-detection.com/2010/12/03/runway-safety-fod-birds-and-the-case-for-automated-runway-scanning/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I pointed out in the article, the system manufacturers are based in the US, UK, Israel and Singapore.<br />
To say that they are &#8220;developing&#8221; systems I think is misleading, the fact is they have &#8220;developed&#8221; systems, they exist as products, and are installed at airports already. As for the cost of maintaining a FOD detection system, it is up to individual airports to do their own cost-benefit analysis, and the big unknown will be the cost due to FOD. For this information I would recommend the report published by Ian McCreary, as discussed <a href="http://fod-detection.com/2010/12/03/runway-safety-fod-birds-and-the-case-for-automated-runway-scanning/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>https://fod-detection.com/2011/02/02/who-visits-fod-detection-com/comment-page-1/#comment-2485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 07:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fod-detection.com/?p=1383#comment-2485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These large slices that refer to Israel and UK originated at the fact that both have companies that are developing FOD detection systems. Actually, when it comes to civil aviation the risk is minor, the maintainability and manageability of all systems are a head hack and the prices simply don&#039;t make sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These large slices that refer to Israel and UK originated at the fact that both have companies that are developing FOD detection systems. Actually, when it comes to civil aviation the risk is minor, the maintainability and manageability of all systems are a head hack and the prices simply don&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
