Latest News

Found some FOD? There’s an app for that

fod-poster

…well, there isn’t, but I firmly believe there should be.

I’ve just read through the new FAA draft Circular on FOD Management, and it discusses the fact that it’s the responsibility of everyone to report FOD if they come across it. I believe that if you want people to do something, especially if it’s not their main role, you have to:

  • make the function quick and easy to perform, and
  • offer an incentive.

And let’s get one thing straight, asking a contractor who’s working airside to visit an office on the far side of the airfield to locate and complete a FOD reporting form does neither of these, it’s definitely not quick, and there’s no incentive. Actually it’s more likely to get them into trouble with their boss as they’d have to explain why they’d not been doing their job for the last 30 minutes!

The first thing you have to do is to give the person who found the FOD a method of recording the event then and there, because if they plan to leave it until the end of their shift then it’s not going to get done at all, and I’m not talking about a new device for them to carry around all day, because they won’t carry it. You have to take advantage of the fact that it’s very likely that they’re carrying a small recording device with them anyway, and yes, if you haven’t already guessed from the mock poster above, I’m talking about a smartphone.

There are 3 reasons why  smartphones are perfect for recording FOD finds:

  • they have cameras
  • they have GPS
  • they can transmit data

The apps function would be very simple with the help of mobile testing services, take a picture of the FOD, select a category (wildlife, tools etc), and assign a risk (low, medium, high), that’s it. The image would be tagged with the location via GPS,and the data would then be sent to a central database. Once the FOD find has been recorded, the app could then give the location of the nearest FOD bin, or supply the phone number of the FOD manager.

Provide an incentive

Even if something is quick and easy to do people still need an incentive to do it. If the user who downloads the app also has to register, then any FOD finds they record will be registered against them, and then it’s simply a case of offering some form of reward, e.g. entry into a monthly prize draw. The more FOD they record the more likely they are to win.

Make it global

One of the advantages of this concept is that once a user has downloaded the app and registered as a user, it could be used on any airfield in the world, the GPS data would be all that’s required to identify the airfield, and this location information would then supply custom information back to the user i.e. the phone number of the FOD manager and the location of the FOD bins (or any FOD procedures that are unique to the airfield)

It’s all about the sharing

Where would all this FOD information go? I would strongly suggest to a single, centrally (FAA?) managed database. Airports could be given access via a website to the data collected from 100’s of airports, this data could then be used to generate better targeted FOD procedures.

If you have any thoughts on this concept then please leave a comment in the comments section below, or get in touch via the contact form.

RAF Gibraltar has some unique FOD issues

Gibraltar is a British overseas territory located on the southern end of the Iberian Peninsula at the entrance of the Mediterranean, overlooking the Strait of Gibraltar. The territory itself is a peninsula of 2.642 sq mi whose isthmus connects to the north with Spain.

The Google Map below shows the main road from Gibraltar into Spain which crosses the runway, from the map you can also see the pedestrians!

The Gibraltar Chronicle has posted an interesting article that describes the FOD situation, and the efforts required to control it. Read the article here.


View Larger Map

FOD Management – Draft FAA Circular 150/5210-23

The FAA today issued  Draft Circular 150/5210-23 –  Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Management.

Description:

Provides guidance on developing and managing a FOD program, including minimum performance standards. Addresses prevention, detection, removal, and evaluation. AC will cancel AC 150/5380-5B, Debris Hazards at Civil Airports, dated 7/5/96.

Comments must be received by the close of business on Friday, July 16,2010

You can view the circular at the FAA website here.

I’ll be reviewing the document over the next couple of days.

Concorde to fly again?

Just over a week after the Concorde trial in France came to a close it has been announced that Concorde might return to the skies. According to the article at the BBC:

The engines on a French Concorde are to be examined as the first move in a £15m project aiming to get the supersonic passenger jet back in the air.

The article goes on to state:

It is hoped the jet will be able to fly as part of the opening ceremony of the 2012 London Olympics.

The verdict from the trial is expected on December 6th .

FOD in the US Navy

Protecting against the dangers posed by FOD requires a lot of manpower, the following images show a FOD walk on board the USS George Washington, and a FOD borescope inspection on board the USS Harry S. Truman, click on the images for more information.

FOD walk on the USS George Washington

FOD walk on the USS George Washington

FOD inspection on the USS Harry S. Truman

FOD inspection on the USS Harry S. Truman

FOD walk at Tyndall Air Force Base

FOD walk at Tyndall Air Force Base

Click to download HiRes

OK, so a FOD walk is not the most exciting of news, but what I do like about these FOD walk articles is that the US Air Force are not shy about the amount of FOD they find, and in this case it was 186 pounds (84kg) of debris!

“More than 300 individuals participated in the FOD walk,” said Master Sgt. Dennis Harper, 325th Fighter Wing FOD prevention manager.

Overall, 186 pounds of foreign objects were picked up on the flight line.

Visit the Tyndall air Force web site to read the full article.

V-22 Osprey FOD incident

OK, so the title is a little misleading, the video below shows a V-22 Osprey coming into land and unfortunately causing a major FOD hazard, but this time it’s the people who are the victims, not the aircraft.

Read more at The Register.

Falls Airport runway has pockmarks

This is a worrying report, $16 million for a runway surface that’s starting to break up after just a few months. It does raise an interesting point of course, that of runway condition monitoring. Detecting FOD that has suddenly appeared on the runway is something that all the current FOD detection systems are designed to do, but detecting changes that occur over a long period of time is also an issue. If you’re considering the purchase of a FOD detection system make sure you raise this with the system vendors.

A $16 million runway project completed just last year at Klamath Falls Airport is showing signs of trouble.

City Manager Rick Whitlock says the aggregate rock used as a base for the pavement has been showing through and creating “pockmarks” in the runway surface. The renovated runway opened last November.

Airport Operations Manager Bill Hancock says a pavement surface should last 15 to 20 years. Officials are concerned that jet engines are ingesting the rock and debris.

“We’re disappointed that it’s occurring, but we are working with the contractors,” Airport Operations Manager Bill Hancock said.

Airport officials started noticing rocks popping out of the pavement in mid-March.”There had been two or three days of some rain, and then the temperatures went up fairly high, and then down low. We went from a freezing to pavement temperatures as high as 90 degrees,” Hancock said. After the series of extreme temperatures, airfield inspectors discovered the holes across the runways and taxiways.

“The rock popping out in aviation terms is what we call FOD, Foreign Object Debris, and that causes Foreign Object Damage. It gets ingested in aircraft engines. It can cause other problems, and so it’s very critical that we keep the pavement surfaces clean,” Hancock said.

Whitlock says the city is negotiating with Kerr Contractors, the firm that did the renovation, to resolve the issue. A proposed fix would grind off the top layer of pavement and replace it with a more durable surface.

The Woodburn-based construction company won the runway project with a $16.6 million bid, much lower than the $24 million estimate provided by engineers. The project was also completed in six months instead of the expected three years. Hancock says the runway is safe now and the airport is fully operational.

“It has resulted in an increased vigilance. We’re inspecting it more to make sure we’re cognizant of when it’s continuing to pop out. We’ve increased the sweeping programs,” Hancock said.

The pavement mix is formulated by the Federal Aviation Administration.

Source (KDRV.com)

“FODetect – Intersections” changes name

FODspot

A few days ago Xsight made a small change to their FODetect – Intersections product, they changed the name to FODspot. The name “spot” implies it could be used at areas other than “Intersections”, so I guess I can see some value in the name change.

Source (Xsight website)

FOD Incident: Spicejet B738 at Delhi – damaged tyre on takeoff

A Spicejet Boeing 737-800, registration VT-SPP performing flight SG-224 from New Delhi to Srinagar (India) with 184 people on board, performed a seemingly normal takeoff from Delhi. Following that takeoff tyre debris was discovered on the runway prompting the tower to inform the crew about the debris on the runway. The crew decided to return to Delhi where the airplane performed a low approach to have tower inspect the tyres, which confirmed one tyre on the right hand main landing gear was damaged, and subsequently landed safely.

The flight departed again with a delay of 3:45 hours.

The airline said the crew returned as a precaution after air traffic control reported tyre debris on the runway. The matter is being investigated.

Source (Aviation Herald)

Latest Tweets

Filter by category

Browse the archives

amazon pop filter