Latest News

The cost of a FOD system – an infographic

FOD cost infographic

Click to view full size

I’ve always liked infographics, they convey complex data clearly and quickly in a way that a report, or a table simply cannot manage.  After watching the recent TED talk by David McCandless I decided to generate a simple infographic that included the cost of a FOD detection system alongside some other aviation costs. I’ve not included actual figures on the graphic as the costs are so variable that it would not be worthwhile.

I plan on generating a new infographic over the next few weeks that will be based on the costs detailed in the Insight report (The economic cost of FOD).

Download the infographic as a PDF.

Diversified Secure Ventures Corp

I’ve been aware for sometime of a patent describing a FOD detection system written by Hilary Vieira, the patent was eventually passed to a company called Secure Runway Systems corp, who went on to become Diversified Secure Ventures Corp. They issued a press release on 22nd June outlining their wish to build a FOD detection system based on the patent.

The patent basically describes a number of monitoring devices located alongside a runway, where the monitoring device:

includes at least one of a video camera, single-frame camera, infrared camera, high definition camera, Light Detection and Ranging device.

The detection is then done by comparing a baseline image to the current image:

at least one monitoring device generates baseline image data associated with a first condition, generates other image data associated with at least a second condition and the at least one processor compares the image data associated with the conditions to determine whether foreign object debris is present in the at least one runway area Read the rest of this entry »

Trex Aviation Systems on Facebook

Trex Aviation Systems, the company that produce the FOD Finder system have a Facebook company page (link). It currently contains images of their FOD Finder system, images of FOD detected by their system, and some general industry news. Read the rest of this entry »

FOD group at LinkedIn

I have recently taken over as Manager of the FOD group on LinkedIn. The group was previously managed by Xsight (a FOD detection system supplier), the group has not been updated for quite some time so I have taken over the management in an attempt to breathe new life into the group. The group is no longer affiliated to any commercial organisation. Read the rest of this entry »

Allegiant MD83 – rejected takeoff due to engine fire

From the Aviation Herald

An Allegiant Airlines McDonnell Douglas MD-83, registration N893GA performing flight G4-768 from Roanoke,VA to Orlando Sanford,FL (USA) with 142 passengers and 5 crew, rejected takeoff from Roanoke’s runway 24 at low speed after a lot of smoke was observed from the right hand engine. The airplane turned off the runway, the tower reported the smoke was no longer visible. Emergency services responded and followed the airplane to the apron, where passengers disembarked normally. Emergency services subsequently confirmed the right hand engine had been on fire and (now at the gate) foamed the engine. Read the rest of this entry »

F-22A susceptible to FOD

F22A

A case has been put before the US Senate Armed Forces Committee for an $8M taxiway to be built at the Holloman Air Force Base (link to map). One of the arguments for the project is that the new taxiway would help reduce FOD damage to the F22A Raptor. The funding has been requested by Tom Udall, the senator for New Mexico. The case states:

Due to the high susceptibility of the F-22A to engine damage caused by ingesting Foreign Object Debris (FOD), F-22A operations require pavements free of FOD. If this project is not executed, all F-22A Raptor operations will remain susceptible to extremely costly FOD damage. Each engine in an  F-22A costs over $6M and a single FOD incident can render an engine useless without major repairs. Given the fact that other installations operating the Raptor have already experienced severe FOD damage incidents, a project costing just under the price of one single F-22A engine pays for itself in short order. Failure to train aircrews in the world’s premier airborne weapons platform will greatly reduce the ability of the U.S. Air Force to project global airpower dominance in defense of the nation.(….source)

There is some evidence to backup the claims regarding the F22A’s susceptibility to FOD damage (and the expense):

In October, 2005 a F-22A from the 27th Fighter Squadron operating from Hill Air Force Base suffered $6.7 Million worth of damage to the right engine after sucking in 5-inch-long landing gear pin while the engines were running.(….source)

For more details and debate regarding the above incident see here.

FAA considering a waiver of the Buy American Preferences for FOD detection equipment

See the The Federal Register for full details.

The purpose of this notice is to request manufacturers of FOD detection equipment, both domestic and foreign, to advise FAA of equipment that they manufacture that can meet the AC requirements. The detailed instructions for submitting the qualifications statement, including forms, may be found on the FAA Web site at: http:// www.faa.gov/airports/aip/procurement/federal_contract_provisions/ at the tab entitled, FOD Detection Equipment Request for Qualifications.

After review, FAA may issue a nationwide waiver to Buy American for the foreign manufacturers of FOD detection equipment. This “Nationwide Waiver” would allow the equipment to be used on airport projects without having to receive separate project waivers. Having a nationwide waiver would allow projects to start quickly without having to wait for the Buy American analysis to be completed for every project, while still assuring that the requirements of Buy American have been met.

Source (the federal register)

FOD Incident: parts of engine cowl separated

Photo: P. Radosta/austrianwings.info

Photo: P. Radosta/austrianwings.info

A Turkish Airlines Boeing 737-800, registration TC-JFV performing flight TK-1887 from Istanbul Ataturk (Turkey) to Vienna (Austria), landed on Vienna’s runway 34 when the crew of the following aircraft taking off reported debris on the runway.

Runway 34 was closed, a runway inspection found several pieces of an engine cowling on the runway.

The right hand engine (CFM56) of TC-JFV was found to have lost parts of its cowling in the area of the thrust reverser.

A replacement Airbus A320-200 registration TC-JPN was dispatched to Vienna and reached Istanbul with a total delay of 6:10 hours.

Source: The Aviation Herald

FOD Incident: Tatarstan B733 at Ufa on Jul 13th 2010, tyre damage on takeoff

From The Aviation Herald

A Tatarstan Air Boeing 737-300, registration VQ-BDC performing flight U9-5655 from Ufa (Russia) to Antalya (Turkey) with 148 passengers, had departed Ufa when the crew was radioed about tyre debris, that was found on the runway. The crew decided to divert to Kazan (Russia) about 250nm west of Ufa, where the airplane burned off fuel and landed safely about 2 hours after departure. One of the right hand main gear tyres was found damaged.

The flight was cancelled, the passengers were re-booked onto two other flights from Kazan.

Source (The Aviation Herald)

FODetect at airport-business.com

Xsight’s FODetect system also makes an appearance at airport-business.com today, but rather than a general article that references the Concorde disaster they are pushing the use of their FODetect – Intersections product for Winter operations. In the article they refer to FODetect – Intersections, I’m not sure this is the current name of the product, as I believe it was changed to FODspot.

Here’s the article in full:

Xsight Systems has launched the new FODetect-Intersections product to provide Foreign Object Debris (FOD) detection for airports’ critical areas. The scalable system has been developed to cover FOD hot-spots and can be easily expanded to cover full runways, taxiways, or all intersections throughout the airport.

Based on Xsight’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) endorsed FODetect technology, the multi-sensor system utilises both radar and cameras for detection. In addition, it also provides source ascription to identify the original cause of the debris.

Alon Nitzan, CEO, Xsight Systems, explained: “The FODetect ascription technology and method offers the airport the ability not only to rapidly detect FOD, but also to identify the vehicle or aircraft that dropped it and to take the appropriate preventative action.”

While the technology has been developed primarily for FOD detection, it can also be of benefit for winter services, as in winter conditions the cameras can be used to monitor the snow clearing process.

Source: airport-business.com (the last article at the bottom of the page)

Latest Tweets

Filter by category

Browse the archives

amazon pop filter